Ugreen Nexode 145W: our full review

A 25000 mAh (92.5 Wh) external battery built to recharge a laptop, with 145 W advertised in total across 3 ports, including 140 W on the main port. In real-world use with actual computers, power tends to fall between 94 and 100 W: no independent measurement found confirms the advertised 140 W peak. The battery's own recharge time, though, meets its 2-hour, 65 W claim, sometimes even beating it. On the market since 2023, this is Ugreen's most established product, and the one most cited by other pages on this site.

Our rating
3.8/5
Capacity and runtime: 3.7 out of 5 (weighting 25%)Capacity3.7Output power: 3.6 out of 5 (weighting 20%)Power3.6Size and weight: 3.9 out of 5 (weighting 20%)Size3.9Ports and cables: 3.7 out of 5 (weighting 15%)Ports3.7Recharging: 4.2 out of 5 (weighting 10%)Recharging4.2Build and endurance: 3.7 out of 5 (weighting 10%)Build3.7
Ugreen Nexode 145W external battery on a light background

The essentials

The Nexode 145W is a mature product that delivers on most of its concrete promises: the battery itself recharges in about 2 hours at 65 W as advertised, and the capacity it delivers, though it varies with the power drawn, stays consistent with expected conversion losses rather than pointing to a suspicious shortfall. The advertised 140 W peak on the main port, however, was not reached in any independent measurement found: real-world draw with actual laptops, including MacBook Pro models, caps more between 94 and 100 W. The screen, contrary to what this page previously suggested, shows only the remaining charge level, not the instantaneous power delivered, a feature reserved for newer Nexode models. Despite three years on the market, very little independent data exists on its medium-term reliability, a genuine blind spot rather than a positive or negative signal. No recall has been identified to date.

Strengths

  • The battery itself recharges in about 2 hours at 65 W as advertised, sometimes even faster
  • Capacity delivered stays consistent with expected conversion losses, with no sign of shortfall, unlike a direct rival evaluated under the same conditions
  • 505 g, about 125 g lighter than its main direct rival (Anker 737)
  • Internal components of recognized quality (BAK 21700 cells, dedicated protection circuits)
  • No recall identified to date for this specific model

Limitations

  • Real-world power with actual laptops between 94 and 100 W, well short of the 140 W advertised on the main port
  • No PPS support (Samsung fast charging), unlike its direct rival the Anker 737
  • The screen shows only the remaining charge level, not the power delivered in real time
  • The main port throttles from 100 W to 65 W once the battery's own remaining charge drops below about 29 %
  • Almost no independent reliability data beyond the first year, despite three years on the market
  • The only product in the comparison not to resume working immediately after a 2.40 m drop in a dedicated resistance test
Ugreen Nexode 145W: see the full details and price →

Careful: "Nexode 145W" refers to more than one different Ugreen product

Ugreen uses the name "145W" for at least two products with distinct specs: the one covered in this review (25000 mAh, 505 g, main port at 140 W) and a separate "145W power bank for laptop" in a different format (590 g, main port capped at 100 W on the spec sheet itself). Everything below concerns precisely the model in this review (Ugreen's internal reference PB205), not the other product.

94 to 100 W in practice, far short of the 140 W advertised

94 to 100 W
real-world power with an actual computer
2h
battery recharge at 65 W
115 W
cap with 3 ports at once

The 140 W peak advertised on the main port corresponds to a protocol ceiling (USB PD 3.1, extended 28 V/5 A mode), reachable only with a fully compatible device and cable. In real-world use with actual laptops, the reality is far more modest: 94 W with a 16-inch MacBook Pro, a 100 W cap (standard USB PD 3.0 protocol) on another unit, and highly variable draw depending on the laptop connected (from 30 W to over 90 W at times) on a third. No independent measurement found confirms a sustained 140 W draw.

A real throttle, but tied to the remaining charge level, not heat

The main port switches from 100 W down to 65 W once the battery's own remaining charge drops to about 29 %, a precise and reproducible behavior. This is not a thermal throttle kicking in after several minutes at full power, a pattern not documented anywhere in the sources consulted, but a limitation tied to the device's own remaining energy level, a power-management behavior rather than a flaw.

Capacity delivered varies with the power drawn, consistent with the physics

At different output power levels, the capacity actually delivered varies but stays consistent: 80 to 87 % of the advertised 25000 mAh at one output power, only 63 % at a higher output power. The higher the draw, the greater the conversion loss: that is an expected physical phenomenon, not a suspicious shortfall. A useful comparison point: a direct rival evaluated under similar conditions delivers noticeably less than its own advertised figure, where this battery stays within a range consistent with the category's usual conversion losses.

2 hours at 65 W, sometimes beaten

A full recharge of the battery itself at 65 W takes about 2 hours, in line with the advertised figure, sometimes in as little as 1h40. Over a 5 V USB-A input (without a PD charger), it takes 13 hours, a clear sign that a compatible fast charger remains essential to reach the advertised speed.

The screen shows the charge level, not real-time power

The built-in screen shows only the remaining charge percentage of the battery itself, in 1 % increments, not the instantaneous power delivered to connected devices. Ugreen does offer that kind of detailed readout (voltage, current, power per port), but on newer, pricier Nexode ranges (165 W, 200 W), not on this model.

Three years on the market, but very little independent reliability data

This is the weakest point of this research file: despite being on the market since May 2023, no independent, dated feedback at 12 or 24 months has been located. Inside, the cells come from an established Chinese cell manufacturer (BAK, 21700 format), alongside dedicated protection circuits, a reassuring sign for component quality, though that is not a substitute for an actual real-world lifespan measurement. This absence of data should not be read as a positive or negative signal either way: it is a genuine blind spot in the coverage available online, worth flagging as such rather than filling in with guesswork.

145 W on 2 ports, 115 W with all 3 ports at once

The advertised split is 140 W on the main USB-C port, 65 W on the second USB-C port, and 22.5 W on the USB-A port, for a total of 145 W reachable using only the two USB-C ports together. A 115 W cap applies when all three ports draw power at the same time, below the 145 W of two-port mode. In real-world use with several devices charging at once, actual combined draw generally stays well under these caps: each device negotiates its own power, and few ever ask for the maximum their port allows.

The only product in the comparison not to work again right after a drop

In an impact-resistance comparison (a controlled 2.40 m drop onto soil, run across several power banks), this specific unit is the only one, among the models involved, that could not immediately recharge a phone after the impact: it eventually worked normally again after one charge cycle. This is an extreme-robustness scenario, not an everyday failure, but a real point of caution next to the rivals evaluated under the same conditions.

No official recall has been identified for this specific model, in the United States or in Europe. Ugreen states it is not affected by the 2025 controversy over decertified cells at several power bank manufacturers (Anker, Baseus, and other brands were recalled at the time), and this model does not appear on the lists of affected models the brand has made public, though an exhaustive independent check of that list was not possible.

A mature product, stable price, responsive support on late failures

The going price has stayed in a 50 to 70 € range for at least two years, with occasional deeper promotions, a profile typical of a mature product late in its cycle rather than a steady decline. No wall charger is included, a real friction point but widely treated as the norm at this end of the market, except for a buyer who does not already own a compatible fast USB-C charger.

The official warranty is 2 years. In the rare cases of failure beyond the first year, warranty replacement was handled quickly when the purchase came directly from Ugreen's official store; the most negative experiences mostly concern delivery and general customer service, not failures of the product itself.

The product and its alternatives

Ugreen Nexode 145W

Ugreen Nexode 145W

See price (41)

The power bank that also charges your laptop: 25000mAh, 145W over USB-C, a control display and enough to power 3 devices at once.

View product

Frequently asked questions

Rarely in practice. In real-world use with actual laptops, power caps more between 94 and 100 W. The 140 W figure is a protocol ceiling, not a sustained power level.

No. It only shows the remaining charge percentage of the battery itself. Detailed per-port power readouts exist on newer, pricier Nexode models, not on this one.

Impossible to confirm independently: despite three years on the market, no independent, dated feedback beyond one year has been found. The internal components (cells, protection circuits), on the other hand, are of recognized quality.

Yes, a USB-C charger compatible with Power Delivery rated at least 65 W, not included in the box. With that kind of charger, a full charge takes about 2 hours.

The rating in detail

Our rating
3.8/5
Capacity and runtime 3.7
Output power 3.6
Size and weight 3.9
Ports and cables 3.7
Recharging 4.2
Build and endurance 3.7
Ugreen Nexode 145W: see the full details and price →